Pg279qm Vs Aw2721dI was looking at either the dell alienware AW2721D or ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM. The AW2721D does feel less snappy than the G7 albeit slightly smoother due to the Gsync module but I do feel this could be expectation bias. us/JGfmmYLAorus FI27Q-X: https://geni. For such a standard monitor without any special features like fald its for me a big disadvantage. Have you tried them yourself? Put me in front of a line of monitors with. Another model some people may be considering and weighing up against the 270Hz Acer models and Dell Alienware AW2721D is the Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X. The Dell has a better vertical viewing angle and better ergonomics, and it's. The PG279QM’s front view is all screen with a thin 8 mm bezel around the top and sides and a 21 mm strip across the bottom featuring the ROG logo in a shiny metallic finish. I do feel that while the AW2721D has some strong traits like Screen Coating, decent semi HDR performance, the G7 feels like a more substantial monitor. I updated op, you may want to check it out. The ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q is slightly better than the Dell S2721DGF. 2 Updated Apr 18, 2023 10:50 AM Searching Finding store Max Refresh Rate 240 Hz Size 32". Tilt adjustment enables a user to change the viewing position of the display, creating a more comfortable view of the screen. The Dell 27" Alienware AW2721D has a refresh rate of 240 Hz, which is excellent for gaming. The Dell 27" Alienware AW2721D has a refresh rate of 240 Hz, which is. Both very similar the most noticeable difference is the AW2721D is much clearer due to the lighter coating. The Asus 27" XG27AQM has a refresh rate of 270 Hz, which is excellent for gaming. The problem with the Asus Pg279qm is you are paying the "rog tax". 6mm shorter? 90mm vs 355. The Asus 27" XG27AQM has a refresh rate of 270 Hz, which is excellent for gaming. It uses a Sharp IPS-type panel rather than LG Display Nano IPS panel (Dell) or AUO AHVA panel (Acer models). I was looking at either the dell alienware AW2721D or ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM. Dell AW2721D: Price: Check on Amazon. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are both 27 inch, 1440p gaming monitors with native G-SYNC support. Asus’ ROG Swift PG279QM packs 240 Hz, and a huge Rec. It’s beyond the capability of LG’s Nano IPS technology. Bottom: 0. ago It can be a little annoying. Overall, the Asus 27" XG27AQM has a better response time when compared to the 27" Alienware AW2721D. Please consider you will need for 240 hz <=4. ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 The Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM deliver very similar performance, but they each have advantages and disadvantages. The AW2721D is a better display for less. Asus ROG Swift PG279QM Monitor Review - 240Hz Gaming Beast RTINGS com 24K views 11 months ago Almost yours: 1 week of TV on us 100+ live channels are waiting for you with zero hidden fees Dismiss. Alienware AW2721D Review - Testing Shroud's Monitor techless 65K views 1 year ago Asus ROG Swift PG279QM Review, The Ultimate 1440p 240Hz Monitor? Hardware Unboxed 247K views 1 year ago Are you. The PG279QM has a 150% sRGB colour gamut specified, with a 99%+ Adobe RGB coverage measured by Hardware Unboxed. The Dell has an overclockable refresh rate of up to 280Hz, which the. Alienware AW2721D review: Better than Samsung Odyssey G7? TotallydubbedHD 43. Else go for the AW2721D that has no backlight strobing but has Gsync module that has a set it and forget it dynamic overdrive (changes the voltage sent to the pixels. The Asus 27" PG279QM monitor has a 97% DCI-P3 color gamut, which is excellent for gaming. Comparison between: - 27" Dell AW2721D - 27" Asus RoG Swift PG279QM Brand, series, model Information about the brand, series, model and model aliases. Comparison between: - 27" Dell AW2721D - 27" Asus ROG Strix XG279Q - 27" Dell Alienware AW2720HF Brand, series, model Information about the brand, series, model and model aliases. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 are different types of gaming monitors. Display Information about the main characteristics of the display - panel, backlight, resolution, refresh rate, etc. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM are very similar, each with strengths and weaknesses. Although the Dell has a higher refresh rate and lower input lag, casual gamers might not notice the difference. This monitor is excellent for the price. The Dell uses an IPS panel that has great viewing angles at the expense of contrast ratio. The "Acer Predator XB273U GXbmiipruzx ". us/1pSCB1eLG 27GP850: https://geni. It is actually more color accurate than the Alienware OR the Asus, but the build quality isn't nearly as good imo. Else go for the AW2721D that has no backlight strobing but has Gsync module that has a set it and forget it dynamic overdrive (changes the voltage sent to the pixels automatically to minimize overshoot across the Gsync range) and you will get good picture quality across the whole refresh range. RoG Swift PG279QM: AW2721D: Alias: PG279QM: Display; Screen Size Class: 27" (inches) 27" (inches) Diagonal Size: 27 in 68. G7 is good too, better for dark rooms, higher contrast, better semi HDR. Covers more colour spaces for versatility. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM are very similar, each with strengths and weaknesses. Why is Asus ROG Swift PG279QM 27” better than Dell Alienware AW2721D 27"? 1 more HDMI ports? 3 vs 2 Has stereo speakers? 265. The PG279QM is hard to find, it's often out of stock although it is a relatively new product, and it is expensive: $850, which is $150 more than the same size Odyssey G7. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM are very similar, each with strengths and weaknesses. Alienware AW2721D review: Better than Samsung Odyssey G7? TotallydubbedHD 43. The Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are both great monitors that use different panel types, each with advantages and disadvantages. The Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are both great monitors that use different panel types, each with advantages and. Why is Asus ROG Swift PG279QM 27” better than Dell Alienware AW2721D 27"? 1 more HDMI ports? 3 vs 2 Has stereo speakers? 265. 9kg Scroll down for more details Why is Dell Alienware AW2721D 27" better than Asus ROG Swift PG279QM 27”? 1053. The Dell supports HDR, whereas the ASUS doesn't, and it also has more USB ports. Asus ROG Swift PG279QM Review, The Ultimate 1440p 240Hz Monitor? - YouTube 0:00 / 20:02 Intro, Specs, Design Asus ROG Swift PG279QM Review, The Ultimate 1440p 240Hz Monitor? Hardware Unboxed. The PG279QM is the best overall out-of-the-box and general use experience due to the G-SYNC module, which as you say, allows variable overdrive, but it doesn't have any form of strobing, whereas the XG27AQM has ELMB. Comparison between: - 27" Dell AW2721D - 27" Asus RoG Swift PG279QM Brand, series, model Information about the brand, series, model and model aliases. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM are very similar, each with strengths and weaknesses. ago Alienware has the gsync ultimate yeah? 1 -Negan-- • 2 yr. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are both 27 inch, 1440p gaming monitors with native G-SYNC support. Asus ROG Swift PG279QM Review, The Ultimate 1440p 240Hz Monitor? - YouTube 0:00 / 20:02 Intro, Specs, Design Asus ROG Swift PG279QM Review, The Ultimate 1440p 240Hz Monitor? Hardware Unboxed. I don't upgrade often, so I'm looking for something decent. The Dell supports HDR, whereas the ASUS doesn't, and it also has more USB ports. Typical gaming monitors usually have a response time of 1 to 6 ms. The Dell has a better vertical viewing angle and better ergonomics, and it's brighter in both SDR and HDR. Compare Asus ROG Strix XG27AQM vs Dell AW2721D - DisplayDB. The AW2721D is, at least in theory, better. The Samsung has a higher resolution screen, resulting in a more detailed, immersive gaming experience. Compare Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T vs Dell Alienware AW2721D Side-by-Side Comparison Products Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T Dell Alienware AW2721D Tested using Methodology v1. About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright. The PG279QM’s front view is all screen with a thin 8 mm bezel around the top and sides and a 21 mm strip across the bottom featuring the ROG logo in a shiny metallic finish. The PG279QM is in my opinion a better monitor for features and versatility but the AW2721D does the advantage in picture clarity in that there’s no grit or grain to the display so you get a very clean image, looks great for things like highlighting finer lines on busier scenes which I find a heavier matte to make things appear a bit layered and …. Standouts for me are like the PG279QM these panels just have a deep, full image whereas the NanoCell panels from LG ala AW2721D, GP850 have a less full-bodied appearance, this could be mostly I believe, a result of lower than normal contrast ratios and the fact that these traditional IPS panels seal very little letting more light through than …. The ASUS has a BFI feature, a quicker response time at 60Hz, a slightly higher max refresh rate, and much better color accuracy. The ASUS, on the other hand, has better reflection handling and a wider color gamut, and it has built-in speakers. The biggest difference will be the G-Sync module on the PG279QM which guarantees variable overdrive and a larger VRR window range and the latency analyzer. Overall, the Dell 27" Alienware AW2721D has a better color gamut when compared to the 27" PG279QM. The Dell is meant for high-frame-rate gaming because it has a 240Hz refresh rate with a 1440p resolution, and it has native G-SYNC VRR support. Dell Alienware AW2721D 27". Check prices on Amazon belowAsus PG279QM: https://geni. Dell does make a monitor with the 27GL850 panel - the 2721DGF, and that has contrast ratings very similar to the 27GL850. Asus ROG Swift PG279QM at Amazon for $713. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM are very similar, each with strengths and weaknesses. ago got both, I prefer the 32 inch G7 for the contrast and immersion. The biggest difference will be the G-Sync module on the PG279QM which guarantees variable overdrive and a larger VRR window range and the latency analyzer. The PG279QM is in my opinion a better monitor for features and versatility but the AW2721D does the advantage in picture clarity in that there’s no grit or grain to the display so you get a very clean image, looks great for things like highlighting finer lines on busier scenes which I find a heavier matte to make things appear a bit layered and. In terms of grainy AW2721D is better than PG279QM, actually better than any IPS monitors I've used, trade off is more glare and reflection. The Asus 27" PG279QM monitor has a 97% DCI-P3 color gamut, which is excellent for gaming. The PG279QM is in my opinion a better monitor for features and versatility but the AW2721D does the advantage in picture clarity in that there’s no grit or grain to the display so you get a very clean image, looks great for things like highlighting finer lines on busier scenes which I find a heavier matte to make things appear a bit layered and …. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are both 27 inch, 1440p gaming monitors with native G-SYNC support. The Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM deliver very similar performance, but they each have advantages and disadvantages. The AUO panel used is quite soapy, grainy. Asus ROG Swift PG279QM 27". Dell AW2721D: Asus RoG Swift PG279QM: Model alias-PG279QM: Model year: 2020: 2021: Display Information about the main characteristics of the display - panel, backlight,. There is a third good option with the same. ROG Swift PG279QM (27") Our Verdict Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM The Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses. Asus starts with a Fast IPS panel sporting a claimed 2 ms response time, a 240. 6mm shorter? 90mm vs 355. I do feel that while the AW2721D has some strong traits like Screen Coating, decent semi HDR performance, the G7 feels like a more substantial monitor. Dell 27" Alienware AW2721D TechReviewer The Refresh Rate of 240 Hz is excellent The Response Time of 1 ms is excellent The Resolution of 2560 x 1440 is excellent The Color Capability of 98% DCI-P3 is excellent The Display Panel Type of IPS is excellent Refresh Rate: PG279QM vs. One thing worth noting is that the AW2721D has a fan thanks to the G-Sync Ultimate module. In terms of grainy AW2721D is better than PG279QM, actually better than any IPS monitors I've used, trade off is more glare and reflection. The PG279QM has a 150% sRGB colour gamut specified, with a 99%+ Adobe RGB coverage measured by Hardware Unboxed. The PG279QM’s front view is all screen with a thin 8 mm bezel around the top and sides and a 21 mm strip across the bottom featuring the ROG logo in a shiny metallic finish. The PG279QM is hard to find, it's often out of stock although it is a relatively new product, and it is expensive: $850, which is $150 more than the same size Odyssey G7. The Asus 27" PG279QM monitor has a 97% DCI-P3 color gamut, which is excellent for gaming. The PG279QM is better than the AW2721D. Color Gamut is the color range that is produced on a display. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 are different types of gaming monitors. Needs to have G-sync, and preferably 14440p capable with good refresh rate. The Dell 27" Alienware AW2721D monitor has a 98% DCI-P3 color gamut, which is excellent for gaming. 350 cd/m². Standouts for me are like the PG279QM these panels just have a deep, full image whereas the NanoCell panels from LG ala AW2721D, GP850 have a less full-bodied appearance, this could be mostly I believe, a result of lower than normal contrast ratios and the fact that these traditional IPS panels seal very little letting more light through than. The PG279QM is hard to find, it's often out of stock although it is a relatively new product, and it is expensive: $850, which is $150 more than the same size Odyssey G7. Suggestions appreciated! User #155601 2784 posts rockqc Whirlpool Forums Addict. SergeiTachenov • Additional comment actions. I would buy a normal LG 27" 144 hz nano ips variant like the lg 27gp850. 2 Updated Mar 09, 2023 09:16 AM Searching Finding store Tested using Methodology v1. Type: Monitor: Monitor: Year: 2019: 2020: Brand: Asus: Dell: Model Series: TUF Gaming: Model Number: TUF Gaming VG279QM: AW2721D: Display; Screen Size Class: 27" (inches) 27" (inches) Diagonal Size: 27 in 68. Comparison between: - 27" Asus RoG Swift PG279QM - 27" Asus ROG Strix XG27AQM - 27" Dell AW2721D - 27" Acer Predator XB273U GX Brand, series, model Information about the brand, series, model and model aliases. Has better performance in motion, I can't really think of a single area the AW is straight up better in. This monitor MSRP is $700 but the real world price on Ebay and Microcenter is $600. The differences are entirely in the model number, and thats what trips up many ppl. Type: Monitor: Monitor: Year: 2019: 2020: Brand: Asus: Dell: Model Series: TUF Gaming: Model Number: TUF Gaming. 2 More posts you may like r/IndianGaming Join. The Dell Alienware AW2723DF and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM are both 1440p, 240Hz gaming monitors with a few differences. The ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q is slightly better than the Dell S2721DGF. The ASUS, on the other hand, has better reflection handling and a wider color gamut, and it has built-in speakers. Dell AW2721D: Asus ROG Strix XG279Q: Dell Alienware AW2720HF: Model alias-ROG Strix XG279Q-W-Model year: 2020: 2019: 2019: Display Information about the main characteristics of the display - panel, backlight, resolution, refresh rate, etc. It also sports Adaptive-Sync and HDR with no need for calibration and premium performance. Comparison between: - 27" Dell AW2721D - 27" Asus ROG Strix XG279Q - 27" Dell Alienware AW2720HF Brand, series, model Information about the brand, series, model and model aliases. The Samsung uses a VA panel that can produce deep blacks thanks to its high contrast ratio. In my opinion Alienware 2721D is the best option. I wouldn't say grainy on PG279QM is. The Dell has a better vertical viewing angle and better ergonomics, and it's brighter in both SDR and HDR. That essentially confirms it is an AUO panel, because only Quantum Dot LED backlight technology can achieve that. Since both monitors are fake HDR, I really see no use for G-Sync Ultimate here. The PG279QM has a 150% sRGB colour gamut specified, with a 99%+ Adobe RGB coverage measured by Hardware Unboxed. Dell Alienware AW2721D 27". The PG279QM can be calibrated, has many different picture modes. 3D 3D displays use various technologies to achieve a 3D effect. 4K subscribers Subscribe 66K views 1 year ago #240hz #CSGO #Alienware Buy the Alienware AW2721D from Amazon:. There is a third good option with the same panel if you live near a Microcenter (they also have it refurbished in the acer store on ebay-positive) (Or BhPhoto too, but don't quote me on that). The ASUS has a BFI feature, a quicker response time at 60Hz, a slightly higher max refresh. I was hoping to spend less than $1000 to meet the above requirements. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM are very similar, each with strengths and weaknesses. The backlight has a 350 cd/m2 output and a 400 cd/m2 peak, while. SDR gameplay wise both are identical but the FI27Q-X has advantages such as full aRGB coverage ideal for photo work and for P3 at worst case, there’s a 3% difference in favour of the AW2721D which is nothing so for colour coverage, the FI27 is the more versatile monitor for colour performance. The PG279QM is the best overall out-of-the-box and general use experience due to the G-SYNC module, which as you say, allows variable overdrive, but it doesn't have any form of strobing, whereas the XG27AQM has ELMB. In terms of grainy AW2721D is better than PG279QM, actually better than any IPS monitors I've used, trade off is more glare and reflection. Overall, the Asus 27" XG27AQM has a better refresh rate when compared to the 27" Alienware AW2721D. The PG279QM is better than the AW2721D. The PG279QM can be calibrated, has many different picture modes. ago Based on other reviews this one has 990:1 ratio and quite bright 507 cd/m2 Compare to quite popular LG 27GL850-B: 735:1 and 315 cd/m2. There are differences between an Asus ROG Swift PG279QM and the PG279Q that aren't apparent on the surface. Size class: 27 in: 27 in: 27 in: Diagonal: 684. The AW2721D has a fan. In terms of grainy AW2721D is better than PG279QM, actually better than any IPS monitors I've used, trade off is more glare and reflection. Dell AW2721D: Price: Check on Amazon. Comparison between: - 27" Dell AW2721D - 27" Asus RoG Swift PG279QM Brand, series, model Information about the brand, series, model and model aliases. ago Only problem with the AW2721D is the lack of a hardware sRGB mode but with novideo-sRGB (and the equivalent albeit more limited feature in AMD's driver) being a thing I suppose that hardly matters. There is a very noticeable difference between 144hz and 240hz in certain use cases, namely - fast, competitive FPS games. GamePlus (Stopwatch/Crosshair/Timer/FPS Counter/Display Alignment) NVIDIA G-Sync processor. The Dell 27" Alienware AW2721D monitor has a 98% DCI-P3 color. Why is Asus ROG Swift PG279QM 27” better than Dell Alienware AW2721D 27"? 1 more HDMI ports? 3 vs 2 Has stereo speakers? 265. The AW2721D is a better display for less. The two I've mentioned above are more expensive I know. Comparison between: - 27" Asus RoG Swift PG279QM - 27" Asus ROG Strix XG27AQM - 27" Dell AW2721D - 27" Acer Predator XB273U GX Brand, series, model Information. Standouts for me are like the PG279QM these panels just have a deep, full image whereas the NanoCell panels from LG ala AW2721D, GP850 have a less full-bodied appearance, this could be mostly I believe, a result of lower than normal contrast ratios and the fact that these traditional IPS panels seal very little letting more light through than …. Total tilt adjustment is the ability for the monitor head to move up and down. No ips monitor is delivering it. The Samsung uses a VA panel and is better suited for gaming in a dark room. The AW2721D does feel less snappy than the G7 albeit slightly smoother due to the Gsync module but I do feel this could be expectation bias. The AW2721D has a high 240Hz refresh rate with a 1440p resolution and native G-SYNC support, while the G2722HS is an entry. The Asus PG279QM sports a 27-inch IPS panel with a 2560 x 1440 resolution, a whopping 240Hz refresh rate, and a 1ms GTG response time. I wouldn't say grainy on PG279QM is heavy, just average level on IPS panel, pretty much same as my previous AD27QD. Needs to have G-sync, and preferably 14440p capable with good refresh rate. ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 The Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM deliver very similar performance, but they each have advantages and disadvantages. 3m more display colors? 1070m vs 16. Interestingly it uses the same BGR subpixel layout at the Gigabyte M27Q. Response time also determines how well a monitor can handle motion — the lower the response time, the better. I wouldn't say grainy on PG279QM is heavy, just average level on IPS panel, pretty much same as my previous AD27QD. Although the Dell has a higher refresh rate and lower input lag, casual gamers might not notice the difference. Have the aw2721d still but I miss the contrast, and motion clarity was better too. 2020 color gamut into a 27-inch QHD/IPS panel. Total tilt adjustment is the ability for the monitor head to move up and. Comparison between: - 27" Dell AW2721D - 27" Asus RoG Swift PG279QM Brand, series, model Information about the brand, series, model and model aliases. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are both 27 inch, 1440p gaming monitors with native G-SYNC support. The differences are entirely in the model number, and thats what trips up many ppl. However, the Dell has a quicker response time at its max refresh rate and a much lower input lag at 60Hz.